Archive for September, 2009

Moviesuck and Timesuck

Posted in Lists on September 29th, 2009 by Dwight – 1 Comment

Rotten Tomatoes recently put out a list of the 100 worst reviewed movies of the last decade. It seems that I’ve (luckily) seen only two of the hundred worst–The New Guy and Alone in the Dark. I saw The New Guy (2002), starring DJ Qualls, presumably because of Elvis Mitchell’s New York Times review (which upon second look doesn’t look all that positive). Perhaps, I was game for this movie solely based on the appearances of Eliza Dushku and Zooey Deschanel.

As for Alone in the Dark (2005), I was fully aware of what I was getting into. My initial introduction to Uwe Boll, this movie’s awfulness was its main selling point. Tara Reid as an archaeologist…I mean, c’mon.

If those are the worst, what are the best? Thanks to a recent Filmspotting podcast, I was introduced to the Flickchart site. The site asks you to rank movies that you’ve seen. To do this, you are given two movie titles and asked to pick which one is your favorite. This binary system is easy for some matchups (say, Casablanca versus The New Guy), but a lot more difficult for others (say, two seemingly really good movies from vastly different eras and/or genres). WARNING: This website is a major timesuck. You will lose many minutes that can never be recovered. But for slightly OCD movie nerds, its a fun site to play around with. So far, after only 237 rankings, my Top 5 Movies of All Time are:

1. ET: The Extra Terrestrial
2. Contact
3. Dogma
4. Ferris Bueller’s Day Off
5. Die Hard

I truly enjoy all five of those movies. But, I wouldn’t necessarily place any of them in my Top 5. I guess I have some more ranking to do…

You’re Not Really Anybody in American Unless You’re On TV

Posted in Week in Review on September 28th, 2009 by Dwight – Be the first to comment

September 21st – September 27th

Match Point – Woody Allen returns to themes he addressed sixteen years earlier in Crimes & Misdemeanors. The one line that struck me upon this viewing:

It seems that scientists are confirming more and more that all existence is here by blind chance—no purpose, no design.

The character of Chris (or perhaps Allen), at a glance, doesn’t fully understand evolution. Of course, evolution does have a chance component, but it also (quite importantly) has a component of selection that is not based on chance. It’s why they call it natural selection.

Just because there is no purpose and design from on high doesn’t mean that everything is left to random chance and nothing else (like morality) matters or that life cannot be enjoyed. Chris may get away with murder based on luck but that doesn’t mean that he has no morality. Chris does admit that it isn’t entirely about luck. “Hard work is mandatory,” he says. But luck does play its part. At any rate, as his fiance says in response to such a world with no purpose or design: “Well, I don’t care, I love every minute of it.”

To Die For – Awww…back when Nicole Kidman was stunning (and appeared in good movies). I miss those days. It’s still a lot of fun though. But for some reason, it seemed a little empty this time around.

Out in the School Yard, Little Peaches Play

Posted in Week in Review on September 14th, 2009 by Dwight – 4 Comments

September 8th – September 13th

Anvil! The Story of Anvil – After watching the documentary and doing some subsequent internet searching, I’m still not entirely convinced that Anvil is for real. It’s just too good to be true. Real or fake, it doesn’t really matter all that much, the documentary is wonderful. Filmmaker Sasha Gervasi is obviously aware of the Spinal Tap influence on the band and his film. We get shots of the band at Stonehenge and even a dial in the recording studio that goes to 11. Oh, and the drummer’s name just happens to be Robb Reiner.  Even if the film truly is more documentary than mockumentary, does the band Anvil exist primarily as parody? Surely, the band exists to fool us. The “documentary” just adds fuel to the mythology. The over-the-top sort of heavy metal that Anvil represents requires you to give in and rock out. It CAN be a lot of fun. Commence devil horns and head banging. METAL ON METAL!!!

The Dead are So Terribly Dead When They’re Dead

Posted in Week in Review on September 8th, 2009 by Dwight – 2 Comments

August 31st – September 7th

The Toxic Avenger – After meeting Lloyd Kaufman at dCFF, watching Poultrygeist, and falling in love with both, I finally got around to seeing this Troma classic. Like with Poultrygeist, I was frankly surprised how entertaining it was. It’s a cheaply made horror movie with lots of over-the-top elements, but it still manages to be a lot of genuine fun. It is certainly more accessible than some of the other movies I’ve seen recently. I am somewhat disappointed that I apparently missed Marisa Tomei’s very brief appearance as Locker Room Girl.

Otto; Or, Up with Dead People – My first foray into the cinematic stylings of gay porn star and director Bruce LaBruce. Yes, it did take me by surprise somewhat. I wasn’t quite prepared for all of the graphic gay zombie sex. Nevertheless, it was very enjoyable. In part, it played as a hilarious spoof of pretentious art films. But ultimately its a smart, well-crafted movie that hits upon issues in the gay lifestyle. The spectre of AIDS, isolation, otherness, hate crimes, and gay recruitment, among others, are all touched upon through the conventions of the zombie genre without seeming at all didactic. And on top of that, the soundtrack was surprisingly wonderful in its queer quirkiness.

Ichi the Killer – From beginning to end, this brutal Takashi Miike directed film is a test of endurance. That it’s also about 30 minutes too long only makes the viewer complicit in the masochism. Its terribly brutal. There is brutal rape, epic sorts of dismemberment, and a puddle of semen (apparently “donated” by Tetsuo director Shinya Tsukamoto, who also plays the role of Jijii in Ichi). But it is, as they say, just a movie. Much (but certainly not all) of the violence is stylized and nearly comical. The rape scenes are certainly horrifying. While we can chuckle at some stylized blood spray or a body being split comically in half (or the image of a Japanese man quite literally “losing face”), we would think it truly despicable if scenes of rape were played for laughs. That Miike knows at least some boundaries is to his credit.

I don’t know enough about Miike’s body of work or of Japanese culture (including manga) to really be able to address what themes are working amongst this brutal violence. Although it may be simplistic, I don’t think you can address the ultra-violent Japanese cinema without bringing up Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That some of the dialogue in the movie is spoken in English seems to suggest that it is partly a message to Americans. As Americans (and I’m certainly guilty), we have delighted in cinematic images of nuclear attacks. Perhaps Ichi, and other violent Japanese cinema, is somehow addressing this paradox.

Also of note is the apparent similarities between the blonde Kakihara and Heath Ledger’s Joker. There are the obvious physical similarities. Both characters sport a Glasgow smile and flamboyant clothing. But there is also a certain bravado in Kakihara that seems mined by Ledger in his Oscar-winning performance in The Dark Knight. There are also some other broader similarities in the stories of the two films that could be drawn.

Who Gets to Call It Art? – While I tend to prefer old and European when it comes to art, I’m coming around to modern art by American artists. This documentary about the curator Henry Geldzahler was a nice introduction to this modern American art. Now, frankly, I want to dive into the works of de Kooning, Johns, Stella, and Warhol (to name just a few). The most revelatory part of this documentary was a brief discussion between Geldzahler and Warhol where Bob Dylan is mentioned. Once I realized that Warhol’s art (take the Campbell’s soup cans as an example) is more akin to (I’m thinking early) Dylan’s art than the European masters, it sort of finally made sense to me. Where Dylan’s brilliance extended beyond his music into his persona and overall aura, Warhol’s brilliance isn’t about the soup cans (the art per se) but also about something much bigger. They are both of their own brilliant inventions.